Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NoFrag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (Non-Admin Closure). Fun Pika  00:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

NoFrag

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Borderline case, appears to fail WP:WEB. SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; plenty of stuff. That it's not in English is not a problem. --Izno (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Could you point out which of those news articles have to do with the subject of the article? Most of the ones on the first page of the results are unrelated. SharkD (talk) 02:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. This should be a little more helpful. SharkD (talk) 02:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: I know I am the one who created this article at first. What makes this article important is the fact that NoFrag is the only French-speaking news and reviews site focusing exclusively in First-person shooter (FPS). Of course all sources are primarily in French because of that, but it should not be a reason to delete it I think (factornews.com, clubic.com, pc-boost.com, xbox-mag.net, pc-facile.com (Italian), scifi-universe.com, matbe.com, lesnumeriques.com, etc... Hervegirod (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - While I am not a French speaker and can't tell you with certainty which of the sites mentioning NoFrag are reliable, there seem to be a lot of mentions of NoFrag in the media per the Google News link above, and Google News tends to be pretty reliable in my experience. SharkD (talk) 02:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.