Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Chinese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Miyun District. Joyous! | Talk 00:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

No Chinese

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A marketing ploy that never materializes, sure it attracted some headlines even abroad, but I believe it is a case of WP:NOTNEWS. Timmyshin (talk) 00:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge into Miyun District. Given the readily available sources (even in English, which I guess for this particular subject isn't too surprising), this subject should certainly not be deleted outright, though I doubt it could be expanded much beyond what is currently on offer; as no future development is likely, a merger seems the best approach. Antepenultimate (talk) 04:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge as Antepenultimate suggested. It would be enough simply to include the lead section of this article into Miyun District and disregard the rest. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:23, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep How can this be deleted using a WP:NOTNEWS rationale? This happened 5 years ago in 2011!  Ottawahitech (talk) 21:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)please ping me


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.