Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Cliché


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Toy Commander. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

No Cliché

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Lack of coverage in reliable sources. — Za  wl  13:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  13:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  13:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect back to Toy Commander. I'm not sure why an article for this was created when no real sources for the company itself exists. ~ Dissident93  ( talk ) 18:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect, however, the direct should be to this article (No Cliche) and not Toy Commander. No Cliche is the company that developed both Toy Commander and Toy Racer and has historical context beyond those two games. If you look at Epics, the article starts with the company itself before proceeding onto the games developed by the company. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect back to Toy Commander. Non-notable company known for Toy Commander, the only notable game they developed, so it's the obvious merge target. --Mika1h (talk) 12:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * And how is Toy Commander more notable than Toy Racer? You're being subjective again. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 15:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * No I'm not, GameRankings lists 23 reviews for Toy Commander, zero for Toy Racer.  --Mika1h (talk) 15:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You should have mentioned that earlier. In that case, I also agree with Toy Commander being the redirected article. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 20:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.