Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Conscription leagues


 * Delete. Vanity. Google returns 34 hits for "No Conscription leagues" -- Chris 73 | (New) Talk 03:00, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * I disagree that this page is vanity. It is insufficient as is, but could be better.  If anything, it just needs to be reworked, and taken beyond 1 or 2 sentences.  Thinking of Canadian context, it could include some of the protests following mandatory conscription in Quebec.
 * Unsigned objection don't get counted. I agree with Alcarillo below, redirect.  RickK 22:11, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to conscientious objector, seeing how there's insufficient info here. Alcarillo 07:15, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Definitely not vanity. I believe the title should be "No Conscription League", which gets 130 google hits, or possibly "No Conscription", for which google hits are probably meaningless.  Also note this is linked from Emma Goldman.  I'd would say merge with Emma Goldman and redirect unless expanded, but the fact that "leagues" isn't capitalised makes me think maybe there is a generic term as well.  But a redirect to conscientious objector would be confusing.  So delete unless expanded. Expanded.  No vote. anthony (see warning) 01:45, 1 May 2004 (UTC)
 * First, not vanity. Second, protests against conscription are covered in Conscription Crisis. Redirect there. Andris 22:31, May 1, 2004 (UTC)
 * I rewrote it, with more details. Let's keep the new version. Andris 22:47, May 1, 2004 (UTC)