Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Danger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  20:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

No Danger

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not pass WP:NMUSIC for album recordings. Band does not have its page, only mentioned in page Amen Dunes which is another band where the artist worked on (and the artist doesn't have its own article, just redirect to the band). There is no significant media coverage regarding this album if any at all, and it's completely unreferenced (note the Allmusic link isn't really a reference in my opinion, and along with its 8/10 rating there is only one user review). I thought this would fit into CSD A9 since the page doesn't state why the album is significant, and the artist doesn't have its own article, but it was declined by an admin. -★- PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 12:11, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -★-  PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 12:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -★-  PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 12:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -★-  PlyrStar93  → Message me. ← 13:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * It's an AllMusic review, not a user review; there are others from Uncut, Spin, PopMatters and Gothamist. Peter James (talk) 14:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete; extremely badly written and only has one source. Not notable. ~SML  •  TP   21:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * It isn't badly written, it's just a stub. Only one source is in the article but I've mentioned others. Potential, not just current state. Peter James (talk) 21:45, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Look at the date, at the time I wrote that it was.  ~SML  •  TP  15:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I think this might be a keep actually – Peter James is right about there being reviews from Uncut and PopMatters, and a semi-review at Spin ... along with AllMusic that's three and a half good reviews, plus another one from UK local newspaper The Birmingham Post & Mail  which means this quite possibly was reviewed in other music magazines like Q and Mojo. Richard3120 (talk) 23:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If that’s the case, why don’t you add them? ~SML  •  TP   23:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Will do – it's just that I'm literally getting ready to travel to the airport in half an hour. :-) Richard3120 (talk) 23:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Done. Richard3120 (talk) 23:59, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - Without an article for the band, this album article should be deleted per policy at CSD #A9. If an admin denied an A9 request, perhaps the policy was read by someone (maybe me) incorrectly, though A9 does say "...where none of the contributing recording artists has an article" and I would assume that to mean the BAND. Since we have an argument above that the album could be keep-able, perhaps the band's article needs to be resurrected first. There was one that was deleted in 2007. If that is not done, the album could be mentioned as an item of pre-history at Amen Dunes. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I actually was going to create an article on it, but I found very little sources that violate my personal minimum of atleast five source in a page, most I could find was only talking about the album. ~SML  •  TP   17:58, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * , I'm guessing that A9 was declined due to the other criterion, "musical recording... that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant". My assumption is that with a couple of reliable sources already included, and including a member that went on to form a notable band, that was enough to invalidate an A9 speedy. I must admit that an A9 was also my first thought, when I saw the artist didn't have their own article. But there are a couple of gig reviews of Inouk around the time of the album's release, and there are retrospective mentions of Inouk in articles about Amen Dunes. I agree that even a stub about the band would strengthen the case to keep this album's article. Richard3120 (talk) 19:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The newly added reviews show that this album has received enough critical attention to meet WP:NALBUM. —  Newslinger  talk   14:44, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment, the album is now well-sourced, but the band doesn’t have a page, and if someone creates one, it would be badly sourced. Everything I could find was talking about the album, not the artist.  ~SML  •  TP  15:30, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Peter James, Richards3120 and Newslinger. Satisfies GNG and NALBUM. Being notable, the album necessarily is both significant and important, and the article clearly indicates this. James500 (talk) 15:01, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.