Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Gravity (Shontelle album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Shontelle. If/when the album is released with reliable sources providing information, the article can be re-created --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 10:23, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

No Gravity (Shontelle album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

way too much speculation with much of the information unsourced and unpublished synthesis. An album with no confirmed release date, no track listing, no album artwork and no recent singles should not be created. a definate breach of WP:Crystal and WP:GNG Lil-unique1 (talk) 15:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom: fails WP:CRYSTAL with no verified track listing or release date. Information about this album should remain at the artist's article for now.  Cliff smith  talk  16:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Shontelle. Based on WP:CRYSTAL and the spirit of TenPoundHammer's Law, but if the redirect suggested by WP:NALBUMS isn't considered appropriate, I'd agree with deletion.  According to WP:NALBUMS, "(G)enerally, an album should not have an independent article until its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label".  Time enough for this article if and when the album comes out.  Accounting4Taste: talk 16:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Shontelle. Best covered in the artist's article (where it's already covered) until there's more encyclopedic, sourceable information available.--Michig (talk) 18:06, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * A redirect would work. Cliff smith  talk  00:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect if anybody can find some solid references, otherwise just delete it. Neither this nor (the target section of) Shontelle have especially impressive sources (a tweet, a blog, and a fansite). Most of what we have in either article is outdated and/or contradictory. &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 11:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.