Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Left Turns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs. The consensus is that the blog is not notable in its own right, but I feel that the content could be usefully merged with the parent organisation  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 04:27, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

No Left Turns

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Disputed notability. Taking to AfD as notability does seem to be arguable with this article. Safiel (talk) 01:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs article. I don't see sufficient notability to stand on its own. Safiel (talk) 01:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't delete nor merge. No Left Turns, a highly referenced conservative blog site, is a creation of the Ashbrook Center, which is notable for its activity and education in public affairs. Ashbrook Center hosts important conferences attended by well-known politicians and public figures. The blog "No Left Turns" is a major source of commentary from the Ashbrook Center. It is notable by itself because it plays a critical role in discussing current events as they unfold and is referenced by a number of other blogs. It has a number of notable authors who are highly regarded. Roesser (talk) 02:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Mention in other blogs is not sufficient to establish notability. While this blog is mentioned in other blogs, I don't see any non trivial references in independent news sources. Safiel (talk) 04:14, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – I give up, how does the article meet the criteria in WP:WEB using reliable sources?  ttonyb (talk) 04:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 00:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Meets general notability requirements because there are enough references to it and it is not invisible on Google. The only criticism is that "No Left Turns" is used and quoted by so many people and for so many different organisations. At some point in the future it may be necessary to change the title to distinguish between all the different "No Left Turns" that are out there.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 05:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.