Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Love (Eminem song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Recovery (Eminem album). Shi meru  00:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

No Love (Eminem song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is a charted song from the album not a single. Per WP:NSONGS as it has no independent coverage and there is not enough detail to produce a detailed quality page it is not notable for an idependent article. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: the lister inadvertently started a second AfD on the same subject, which I am deleted under WP:CSD. The rationale was similar, but slightly different. I am including it here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment, error was down to twinkle duplicating the nom. Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — Cliff smith  talk  00:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Recovery (Eminem album) per WP:NSONGS: "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article". --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 01:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect Restore when its noteable. Red Flag on   the Right Side  02:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect No confirmation of it being a single. Even if it were, there is not enough available information on the article for it to withstand on its own. Candyo32 (talk) 03:19, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is reliable enough, keep. Otherwise, redirect to Recovery (Eminem album) per WP:NSONGS. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Weak article: the song's notability is only inherited from the album. Merge with Recovery (Eminem album). SteveStrummer (talk) 16:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Not even a confirmation that it will be a single and really nothing other than its charts establish notability. Str8cash (talk) 23:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect, even if article is deleted a redirect in its place would be appropriate. I don't see a compelling reason to delete the page history if the end result is the same. Swarm Talk 07:36, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect Not a single IJA (talk) 18:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.