Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No More Heroes (record label)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

No More Heroes (record label)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable recording company fails to meet WP:ORGCRIT and WP:ORGDEPTH, No RS found, trivial coverage in Billboard and Chicago Reader. Not to be confused with No More Heroes (album), No More Heroes (series), No More Heroes (video game). M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Organizations,  and Companies. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:03, 27 January 2023 (UTC)


 * This is a friendly reminder to keep this community civil and to refrain from making retaliatory deletion requests. The sources are clearly not trivial as they are the primary topic mentioned in both the content of the articles and the title of the articles. These are the 2 sources (out of 4 total) that are being questioned.
 * Chicago Reader - No More Heroes are Building the Future of Hip Hop
 * Billboard - DCG Brothers Sign to No More Heroes/Atlantic Records, Release ‘House Party’ Video
 * Officialangrydub (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you have evidence that the nomination is retaliatory? Perhaps it's at a talk page elsewhere; if so, then show it. Meanwhile, the nomination does not strike me as un-civil though it is quite vague. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 15:44, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Please check the users Talk page. Officialangrydub (talk) 01:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - There aren't a lot of sources out there, but those that can be found (and which were in the article before the nomination) indicate that the professional music media has seen fit to report on the label, its artists, and an agreement with Atlantic Records. This is an acceptable stub article. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 15:46, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Is this topic closed, my apologies for the confusion, but I assumed this response meant this was situated. Officialangrydub (talk) 01:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * At the talk pages for the two other people in this debate plus the record company's talk page, I do not see a single thing that is retaliatory or uncivil. It's just a minor disagreement on sources and a little education on how deletion nominations work. This here AfD debate is about the notability of the record company so let's focus on that. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 15:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. The sole keep vote doesn't really list sources beyond those in the article, and I'm frankly not able to find sources that meet SIRS that are not listed in the article. A full evaluation of the sources in the article in light of WP:NCORP is below:


 * The sources I can find online outside of those in the article are New York Weekly (a site run by a PR firm that masquerades as a news website and is on the Wikipedia blacklist) and Clark Street Collective (a self-published blog of a video/photo studio), both of which clearly fail to contribute to notability. Since the sources in the article do not satisfy WP:NCORP, and a search of sources online does not appear to turn up any sources that would contribute to NCORP, it looks like this should be deleted per WP:DEL-REASON#8 as having an article subject who fails to meet the relevant notability criteria. —  Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 15:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'm not seeing enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 02:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.