Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Room for Magic (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deryck C. 12:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

No Room for Magic
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Has no non-primary sources or any evidence of notability. For the benefit of those interested in the comic, I'd recommend making a TV Tropes page or something. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 31 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 01:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. In the last AfD discussion multiple editors claimed that this comic passed WP:WEB No. 3, "The content is distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators", because it is hosted at Keenspot. However, there don't appear to be any independent sources about it on Google News or Books, and I can't see any common sense reason why this webcomic should be notable. —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 06:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Reply Keep in mind the last AfD was in 2006; I believe back then we were a bit less strict on the notability thing. And even then, it only came out as "No consensus". – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 23:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed - it could be that we need to review WP:WEB #3 - I remember wondering about that criterion when I first read it. I might start a thread on the talk page there. —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 00:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable sources means this fails on Verifiability as well as Notability. Rangoondispenser (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.