Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Sinner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200  (talk &#124; ctrb) 23:47, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

No Sinner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject appears to not meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:BASIC for a Wikipedia article. Source searches are not providing reliable sources. ZeUs SoSo (talk) 14:02, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ZeUs SoSo (talk) 14:02, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 August 13.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 14:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep – Easily meets WP:GNG or WP:BAND criterion #1 with coverage in reliable sources such as the Kamloops Daily News, The Vancouver Sun , The Province  , Rocky Mountain Outlook , Kamloops This Week , The Windsor Star , Burnaby Now , the Georgia Straight , Exclaim!  and so on.  Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 02:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The sources are few, their fan base is very low, and a up-and-coming band do not need to have a Wikipedia Page. The article has not encyclopedia interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeUs SoSo (talk • contribs)


 * Keep per Paul Erik; there are sufficient sources to establish that this trio meets WP:BAND and WP:GNG.  Gongshow   talk  02:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Has this band won an award, or reached any chart? Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. message me . ZeUs SoSo (talk) 03:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The guidelines for inclusion do not require a band to win an award or reach any chart. — sparklism hey! 07:09, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete the article seems to be about advertising and promotion, please see WP:PROMOTION and/or WP:SOAP. The article has a low-quality writing skill and the sources are not enough to stable that the article needs a Wikipedia Page. ZeUs SoSo (talk) 03:54, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Struck duplicate !vote above from the nominator. Your nomination is your !vote. However, feel free to comment all you'd like. NorthAmerica1000 05:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Paul Erik has demonstrated that the band meets WP:BAND and passes the general notability guide. The arguments presented here that the article has a low-quality writing skill and the article has not encyclopedia interest are not really valid reasons for deletion. — sparklism hey! 07:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep- Review of the sources posted by User:Paul Erik indicate that this band passes WP:BAND and WP:GNG. NorthAmerica1000 05:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.