Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Slack Productions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:20, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

No Slack Productions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

De-PROD-ed by an IP address which also removed the extant COI template. Original PROD rationale was Source search indicates failure of WP:NCORP.  SITH   (talk)   18:11, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete no evidence of significant coverage needed to meet WP:GNG --DannyS712 (talk) 06:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - music producers and production companies are almost always deleted at AfD, because they are so common. If they are also a musical artist, we keep them for that reason; being a producer is secondary to their notability even if that gets them to be a Grammy voter, as may be in this case. I also note there are no reliabale sources to prove general notability. Bearian (talk) 23:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.