Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Ten Dollars Ride


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 15:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

No Ten Dollars Ride

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

COI editor promoting his own non notable short film Wuh  Wuz  Dat  14:26, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable short film for which I can't find any discussion, per WP:MOVIE. --Glenfarclas (talk) 19:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable -- Raziman T V (talk) 13:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep This short film is a stub -- Rhythm live--Rhythm live (talk) 01:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC) — Rhythm live (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Stubs still need to be notable. Joe Chill (talk) 21:04, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: Relisting as this seems to have disappeared off the 13 December AfD log. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak keep there appears to be at least one cited independent review, plus two citations to the incidents that seem to have inspired the film. DES (talk) 20:46, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is only one reliable source with significant coverage and I can't find anymore. Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 21:08, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep This article have source of significant coverage and incidents that relates to it. It's within the scope of WikiProject Singaporean Arts and Entertainment Eveswing (talk) 01:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment; Eveswing has previously been identified as a "likely sockpuppet" of the article author. Wuh  Wuz  Dat  05:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.