Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Woman (film) (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Dane 2007  talk 01:16, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

No Woman (film)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously created three different times at No Woman, I cannot find significant coverage of this 3 minute short in reliable sources Western Sand (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * keep award winner. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:45, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, one non notable award. The mere fact of having a single award does not always establish notability. Explain yourself further or else your comment provides no reasonable explanation for keeping the article. Western Sand (talk) 05:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment: would like to see if anyone can find some RS sourcing and independent coverage for this entry. Kierzek (talk) 20:27, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: I found a fairly pathetic stub while stub-sorting, could see that earlier versions had been AfD'd but found source for the award and considered that by the time it was cleaned up it was probably substantially different from the version AfD'd and worth an article. Verifiable award from Women's Voices Now. Pam  D  06:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per PamD.   Montanabw (talk)  18:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, per what PamD found. Kierzek (talk) 19:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Weak notability but still notable.(Littleolive oil (talk) 01:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC))
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails notability guidelines as given in WP:NFO. It is surprise if short video clips such that starts becoming encyclopedic entries. Syed Rahmat Ullah Shah (talk) 18:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.