Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No shit, Sherlock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete-- JForget 00:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

No shit, Sherlock

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced for ages, already transwikied to Wiktionary. Verifiability issues. Wafulz 03:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete-per CSD a5 ChrisLamb 04:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Page after page of Ghits for blogs, but nothing authoritative and no single source into which it could be merged (at least, none that dates back to when I remember the phrase being used verbally, long before the sources cited).  If it's at Wiktionary, that would seem to be enough.  Accounting4Taste 04:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete under A5 - all verifiable info has been transwikied, and it is extremely unlikely any more encyclopedic content could be added. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 05:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * delete - as per above reasons mentioned A5. Iamchrisryan 12:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no shit... ORLY. Lugnuts 15:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable and informative.  Has potential to grow.  Bacchiad 18:07, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not encyclopedic, already on wikitionary. ILovePlankton(L—n) 18:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per above. Articles like this make me wish the definition of patent nonsense could be expanded.--UsaSatsui 21:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, sherlock.  Bur nt sau ce  22:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.