Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No taking pictures allowed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kubigula (talk) 22:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

No taking pictures allowed

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I think this is not an encyclopedic topic at all. The article is nothing but original research. Anbu121 ( talk me ) 14:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect to Photography and the law. Delete because it's unsourced OR. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete  Zero sources.  Nothing but unsourced sweeping personal observations / generalizations, so there is really no material to move. North8000 (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Newcomers to Wikipedia are confused by the poorly titled policy "No Original Research." After all, each and every article on WP includes some facts and not others — which is research — and does not lift material wholesale or commit close paraphrase plagiarism from a published source — which makes it original. Yes, EVERYTHING at Wikipedia is technically "Original......Research." So what's the policy that we all agree with but don't really think about too analytically trying to prohibit, you ask? Why stuff like this piece here, precisely — "No Unsourced Original Essays." Carrite (talk) 17:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete reads like the first draft of someone's homework. Very poorly written and I strongly suspect some of it was simply made up. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as worthless and unsalvageable, and do so very soon. Don't bother to turn into a redirect, as it's most unlikely that anyone will type "No taking pictures allowed". &para; The creator of this article is a very enthusiastic contributor of such material as this. -- Hoary (talk) 00:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Photography and the law. It's essentially original research. Here's an article that mentions the topic: The ins and outs of the burger biz, but the topic per the article's title isn't covered significantly in reliable sources (after performing some searches). Northamerica1000(talk) 02:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. If it must be redirected, redirect to "No photography allowed" which can redirect to "Photography prohibited" which can redirect to "Taking pictures prohibited" which can redirect to "Photography banned" which can................ Emeraude (talk) 11:34, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.