Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No to Reservations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Kimchi.sg 02:46, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

No to Reservations
Non-notable website/forum. After some searching on the net, I did not find ANY mention of this forum in any newspaper/website other than self. Clearly fails WP:WEB. &mdash; Ambuj Saxena (talk) 16:19, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as the website doesn't appear to meet any of the relevant criteria for notability. Anirvan 19:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: It is a significant political and social issue that should be included. --Vikramsingh 01:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. The issue is important without doubt. This nom is about a specific website/forum's article. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 03:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Ambuj. The site has a Google PR of 0. Besides less than 10,000 votes have been registered till now. Fails WP:WEB. -- thunderboltza.k.a.D e epu Joseph15:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 21:49, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Just delete per nom. -- Big  top  ( tk | cb | em | ea ) 00:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.