Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Akanakimana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Article's subject is found to not be notable. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:47, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Noah Akanakimana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was ''Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. The claim that he has played for Burundi is not supported by reliable sources.'' PROD was contested by the article's creator, who is probably also the subject of the article given their username, without providing a reason, though the claim that he has played for Burundi has since been removed. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 21:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as he hasn't played in a Fully Professional League and doesn't have any international caps. IJA (talk) 13:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Player fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played in a fully professional league, nor senior international football. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Fenix down (talk) 16:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.