Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Blake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  No consensus to delete. Further discussion about whether the article should be kept and improved or converted to a redirect can continue at the talk page. Eluchil404 (talk) 02:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Noah Blake

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This has been previosly deleted from an afd here, but the speedy as a repost was denied with "should not have been deleted for the reason it was", so I'm bringing him back as a seperate afd.
 * The link you provided doesn't lead to an AFD for Noah Blake. It leads to Articles for deletion/Courtenay Semel.— Ѕandahl 23:25, 18 March 2008 (UTC)  I see it was was included.— Ѕandahl  23:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Although there's a long list at his IMDB, none of his roles were substantial. His father is a non-factor due to WP:NOTINHERITED. In short, Delete per WP:BIO  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 22:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per previous discussion and CSD G4. -- GW_SimulationsUser Page 22:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - not G4 as the article appears to have been speedy deleted last time (despite the previous AfD). No reliable sources that establish notability, it might be appropriate for some information to be merged into Robert Blake (actor). Guest9999 (talk) 22:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If Noah's article is merged to that of his father, two principles (both more important than "notability") come into play: (1) the content attribution requirements of the GFDL would require us to at least keep the revisions which yielded the content being merged, and (2) common sense would require us to keep the title "Noah Blake" as a redirect pointing to Robert Blake (actor), or some functionally similar section within the article to which the content has been merged. See Merge and delete for more information. — CharlotteWebb 13:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Dreamspy (talk) 09:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, either as an article or as a redirect with history intact (a.k.a. "merge"), in the absence of any compelling reason to delete. — CharlotteWebb 13:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article needs work but person is verifiably notable for reasons other than his parentage. House of Scandal (talk) 21:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability is verifiable independent of his parents.— Ѕandahl 22:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.