Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Foster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Noah Foster

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Rugby union player fails WP:NBIO with no coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. Also, the user who added the notability template correctly noted that meeting WP:NRU does not imply notability in any way. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Rugby union,  and New Zealand. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Although he does pass WP:NRU, I'm only seeing passing mentions and database websites in terms of coverage, so fails GNG. I've looked for a suitable redirect here, but can't really find one at this stage. He may well be notable in the future though, so could potentially be moved to draftspace, but Tasman won't play for another year. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The coverage of him in the cited source is nowhere near significant. Notice that WP:NRU says "significant coverage is likely to exist" (emphasis mine), not that it necessarily does. Partofthemachine (talk) 19:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.