Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Khyle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Consensus was reached that there is insufficient coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  03:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Noah Khyle

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Noah Khyle

Actor who does not appear to satisfy general notability or acting notability. There are two copies of this BLP, one in article space and one in draft space. The BLPPROD can be removed from the article, because it now has a reliable source, but the reliable source is a passing mention. The other reference is IMDB. There is nothing in this stub that refers to significant coverage. The draft can be left in draft space, because the actor may satisfy acting notability in the future. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC) I believe this article should be published — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgold79709 (talk • contribs) 22:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC) Robert McClenon (talk) 07:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - A source has been added, so I am updating the source analysis table. The source is another passing mention.
 * Delete: per nom and above source evaluation.  // Timothy :: talk  18:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG - this is a BLP with three less than reliable sources. Even if arguendo you can argue that at least one of them is reliable, there s less than significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 15:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.