Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Miller (businessman)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Noah Miller (businessman)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. A single local news piece does not establish notability, as articles require multiple independent reliable sources, a mention in a small local paper doesn't cover that. The Shorty Blog is not an independent source. Aoidh (talk) 09:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  15:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  15:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop false reporting, references and sources have been updated. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffreystance1 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC) — Jeffreystance1 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Speedy Delete as per nom. Sir Joseph (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The sources added don't fix the issues with the article. YouTube videos are not reliable sources and do not show notability per either WP:GNG or WP:BIO. - Aoidh (talk) 18:40, 1 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of notability. It's also worthwhile to point out that some of the article's paragraphs are verbatim copies from one of the sources (the Real Time Academy one).  Also, the source for the Shorty Award says only that the subject will be on the jury for judging entries, not that the subject actually won the award ("false reporting", indeed).  NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I also echo what's said here, expected mentions and expected information but nothing convincing for independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.