Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noah Z. Jones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per WP:BLPPROD, as no reliable sources had been added within the ten days after the BLP PROD tag was added. Once someone has a reliable source, they should request undeletion at WP:REFUND. If Mr. Jones is as notable as those below say, this should not take very long. Stifle (talk) 10:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Noah Z. Jones

 * – (< >View AfD  View log )

BLP article with no reliable references (subject's own website and Facebook page only); repeated removal of BLPPROD tag by author despite warnings and explanations. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY  20:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Plenty of references can be found. -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 21:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The person seems notable, although the article itself may not cite the correct sources to confirm this; Google returns approximately 438,000 results regarding the query "Noah Z. Jones", while not all of them are reliable, they all seem to relatively contain the same content regarding this person.  Angelo  ♫ 22:30, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above and subject seems notable. Baseball   Watcher  22:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:CREATIVE point 3. He is the creator of multiple well known works in the form of the TV series Fish Hooks and Almost Naked Animals, which have been covered in reliable sources such as Variety, Animation Magazine, Animation Insider, etc. -- Whpq (talk) 14:29, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment After seven days, it's still, as the nominator said, a BLP article with no reliable references.... Mandsford 00:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.