Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nobody No-One


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 00:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Nobody No-One

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I literally don't even know how this guy has an article. Literally no sources exist, and he appeared about twice. Doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV. Pokelego999 (talk) 00:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy. Pokelego999 (talk) 00:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - unsourced, not well written, is literally a side character in a small production. 100% fails notability so I agree with deletion
 *  Frzzl  talk · contribs   09:50, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Unsourced fancruft, and I don't use that word lightly. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Without sources this can never meet WP:V or WP:NOT, let alone WP:SIGCOV. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete the old notability threshold for Dr. Who characters was seemingly “two appearances”. Dronebogus (talk) 01:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - Incredibly minor fictional character that only ever appeared in two pieces of completely non-notable Doctor Who spinoff material. No sources included in the article, and searches brought up no coverage outside of fansites. Rorshacma (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.