Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noelle Perris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm afraid I discounted the !vote by User:AugustinMa as their argument did not address how the article is able to meet Wikipedia's article guidelines and policies. I also discounted the !vote by User:SwisterTwister because WP:CREATIVE is not relevant here, rather WP:NACTOR is. After this, there is, I think, consensus that the subject does not meet inclusion criteria for an article in the encyclopedia. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Noelle Perris

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails WP:NACTOR. There are no reliable sources to be found about this woman, and a google news and google books search only finds few sources saying the name of this actress in passing mention to a film or TV show she appeared in, which her resume also appears to be very small. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 04:03, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 06:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Not satisfying WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister   talk  06:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Minimal article but the actress has had prominent roles in six feature films and a tv series called "Zimm".Atlantic306 (talk) 17:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Well... OK, at least her filmography's a little better than I though it was, but still, the actress needs in-depth coverage in independent sources. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 18:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm just not seeing the notability here.  Even if we look at the credits list at Imdb, we don't see much evidence of "prominent" roles.  Two of the three films mentioned in her Imdb biography don't have her listed on the posters for those films, so even the producers of those films didn't think her roles were significant.  The one exception is for The Golden Veil, for which she is also credited as an associate producer (which suggests that she got her starring role because she helped finance the film).  In any event, it isn't a notable film.  In addition, there has been a multiple-issues banner on the article for almost four years.  I see no plausible prospect for any improvement.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:41, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * When I wrote prominent I meant 1 top billing, 1 second billing, 2 third billings, 1 fourth billing,2 fifth billings,plus recurring 4th billing in admittedly short lived tv series.Atlantic306 (talk) 02:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the clarification. But considering that WP:NACTOR calls for "significant roles in multiple notable films ...", would you specify which of those roles meet this criterion?  NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Wikipedia red tape is what's preventing me from wasting too much time editing articles and contributing more. AugustinMa (talk) 10:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The creator not being able to contribute to the article is no excuse for an article to be kept. The least you can do is link in this discussion to reliable sources proving this woman is notable. And what the hell do you mean by "Wikipedia red tape" anyway? edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 07:13, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches did not turn up enough to show they pass WP:GNG, and can't see how they pass WP:NACTOR.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.