Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nofal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 13:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Nofal

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable.. name, I guess? Wikipedia has such name articles as disambig pages between articles on the various 'holders'; considering we have doctors, pharmacists, children and a 1,000 year old priest I think I can safely say we are not going to be having articles on these people unless the notability guidelines take a trip off Beachy Head. Ironholds (talk) 12:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ??? Is there a WP standard on articles on family names? I would think that an article could be written about almost any name. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Clear attempt at self-promotion by article author.  Edward321 (talk) 16:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong, strong delete. Agree that this is self promotion (editor name is"tnofal" or something). Also, it may be the worst article on wikipedia right now. Timneu22 (talk) 21:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I beg to differ; see this. Ironholds (talk) 21:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, fine. The article you cite is worse! ;-) Timneu22 (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yay, I win! That's one of those competitions it is best not to try particularly hard in :P.Ironholds (talk) 05:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Self promotion of a non-notability. Drmies (talk) 03:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete nn name; most names are - get over it. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually most last names are worthy of an article - assuming that there are multiple people/items notable enough for pages it is commonly used as a disambig page. Ironholds (talk) 06:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Most last names have no one notable with the last name. A few last names have many notables (whether or not related to each other). First names are similar. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, even aside from the possibility it's a COI, this appears to be a clearly nonnotable and indeed insignificant name. Shall I produce an article about my almost-unique surname, which (as far as I know) is used only by my close relatives, and hasn't produced anyone of more long-term significance than a career US Army officer.  Nyttend (talk) 06:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 20:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.