Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NoisePunk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete and Redirect to Noise rock. —— Eagle 101 (Need help?) 21:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

NoisePunk

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

AfD nominated by TeN with reason: "this article is mostly nonsense and pure opinion, and the majority of it is identical to (i.e. stolen from) the much more profesionally written Noise Rock article." This is a procedural nomination - my opinion is Neutral. Tevildo 23:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nonnotable. Only 2,050 G-hits. Also unverifiable.  bibliomaniac 1  5  00:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I find 186 articles on Newsbank for "noise punk". I'll have to look more into it this weekend. My recollection is that this is a valid subgenre of punk although it might already be covered better elsewhere. ~ trialsanderrors 01:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like the list of bands is stolen from Noise rock, and the intro is pretty much unsalvageable, so redirect to Noise rock unless someone can establish that those two are not the same genre. ~ trialsanderrors 16:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * redirect to Noise rock. - Peregrine Fisher 22:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and Stub or Merge, I've heard of it, and know of a few of the bands, the only one I really 'listen' to is AMEN. With a little work this article could become more relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emevas (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per nom. Stinks of original research, and it's basically redundant with the noise rock page. Could always just blank and redirect. WesleyDodds 10:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Noise rock unless reliable sources establish that there is a difference. SWAdair | Talk 07:51, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.