Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noise Industries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:31, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Noise Industries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find anything to meet WP:GNG. All the sources I've found are either blog sites or press releases. —Torchiest talkedits 23:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I looked and also couldn't find coverage of the company in reliable sources, and I could only find a couple sources covering the main FxFactory product in any detail (PCWorld announcement, PCWorld Australia review). Dreamyshade (talk) 07:25, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 15:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete No notability, the company and its products merely exist. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is relevant coverage of the company and its products from reliable sources (MacLife Magazine, Post Magazine, Editors Guild Magazine, PCWorld, VideoMaker Magazine). Fcpanboy (talk) 12:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * All of those articles cover the FxFactory product, rather than the company. I'd say there's probably enough to write an article for the product based on all the sources presented here though. —Torchiest talkedits 00:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 09:59, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Automatic Strikeout  ( T  •  C ) 00:09, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * Comment – the keep above is from the article's creator, who has no other edits outside of that article and this page. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 00:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Nonetheless, he is certainly allowed to dispute the deletion, and the author is not considered to be an SPA from a !voting perspective. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:11, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the info. SPA was my concern, but I wasn't certain. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 05:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.