Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 6030 features


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted G11 by User:Nyttend. Non-admin closure. ApprenticeFan talk  contribs 12:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Nokia 6030 features

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a personal product review of the Nokia 6030 mobile phone. The article has been deprodded by the article creator. There is no appropriate content here at all. Fences &amp;  Windows  01:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ultra (x 10 to the power of 600) Strong Delete: Well this only violates: WhatWikipediaIsNot, WhatWikipediaIsNot, and NPOV, is that enough for deletion? KMFDM FAN  (talk!) 02:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as CSD G11, blatant ad. I tagged into the article. ApprenticeFan  talk  contribs 09:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Restore the version before this editor started to edit (and that article needs help ... I've put a copy of the text on this talk page of this AfD), but AfD isn't appropriate after the original is restored. Here is this editor's contributions; note that they edited an existing article, then that article was deleted (bad call), then they re-created the article. - Dank (push to talk) 11:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatant OR-POV fork of Nokia 6030. Dank, I can find no evidence that Nokia 6030 was deleted; where are you seeing that? It appears to me that when Ccircle's material was (rightly) removed from that article, he created this as a fork. Deor (talk) 12:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted as advertising. If the Nokia 6030 information were not present elsewhere, or if the article had been moved from one place to another, it would be different; but as the less problematic information is yet present elsewhere, there is no good reason to have such a pile of advertising remaining at all.  One could redirect the page, I suppose, but "Nokia 6030 features" sounds like a rather unlikely redirect in my mind.  Nyttend (talk) 12:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.