Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 8600 Luna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep -- JForget 00:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Nokia 8600 Luna

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Another non-notable cellular phone. Wikipedia is not a Nokia catalog, and this article is nothing more than a description of the phone's features. Insufficient substantial third-party sources exist to carry a viable Wikipedia article on this product. The article is just a list of features and essentially unreferenced. Listing for AfD after prod removed. Mikeblas (talk) 01:51, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a celphone catalog. No proof of notability. Edison (talk) 00:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep&mdash;adequate references available; appears notable. Spacepotato (talk) 07:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep; 1000s of people will have this phone. It is notable. --For Queen and Country (talk) 08:07, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Citi Cat   ♫  03:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep refs exist, and they are extensive. Enough for notability.  --Jayron32| talk | contribs  04:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Enough references to verify notability. Master of Puppets Care to share?  06:52, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a directory nor is it a cell phone catalog. That's what the Nokia website is for. Collectonian (talk) 08:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It has been sourced to verify its notability. Pre  ston  H  17:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Citations clearly pass WP:N. --Mdmkolbe (talk) 22:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.