Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 8800


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No Consensus to delete, disagreement over whether sources in article are enough to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 18:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Nokia 8800

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Another non-notable cellular phone. Wikipedia is not a Nokia catalog. Insufficient substantial third-party sources exist to carry a viable Wikipedia article on this product. The article is just a list of features and essentially unreferenced.

prod was removed by User:For Queen and Country with the comment "Article does not read like an advertisement", so now we're at AfD. Mikeblas (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep; adequate sources exist, appears notable; also, now referenced. Spacepotato (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N. Cell phones change to often. The references are mostly product review sites. Gtstricky (talk) 23:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep; notable, several references EJF (talk) 19:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep; valuable information, very structured K 15:12, 8 December 2007 (GMT + 1) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.219.189.41 (talk)
 * Keep; Good information, non-biased and article is of a size sufficient to the subject's notability. --For Queen and Country (talk) 02:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * User above blocked indef as troll and likely sock Secret account 07:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete nn phone Secret account 07:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.