Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 8850


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. - Zeibura (  talk  ) 16:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Nokia 8850

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable commercial product. Wikipedia is not a cellular phone directory. Wikipedia is not a Nokia catalog. This article is completely OR, with no references whatsoever. Insufficient substantial third-party references exist to make an article that's anything more than a review or adsvert, itself. Mikeblas (talk) 16:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable. Tim Q. Wells (talk) 19:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Evidently notable. This model has an especially notable plug in feature.  Colonel Warden (talk) 10:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable as above. And stop trying to poke gaps in phone articles. Attack the system not the individual parts of it if you feel things shouldn't be this way.--Him and a dog 14:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete &mdash; Not an encyclopaedic topic, generic article about a cell phone, Wikipedia doesn't need articles like these, since all that's needed is a Google search and you can check the phone on the website of its manufacturer. &mdash; EliasAlucard (Discussion · contribs) 03:36, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.