Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia N85


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. X clamation point  22:14, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Nokia N85

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod added by User:Ironholds with the concern "non-notable product", and seconded by User:mikeblas (me). Both removed by User:98.207.254.158 with the comment "this is a fair stub".

The article describes a future commercial product which is non-notable and rapidly obsolesced commercial product. No claim of notability is given. As it stands, the article is blatant advertising--just a copy of a spec sheet. Because Wikipedia is not a product catalog nor a cell phone guide, I don't think this article is salvageable. Mikeblas (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep unless you want delete (nearly) all mobile phone articles, we need a uniform measure --Armando82 (talk) 17:16, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep no different than any other stub for cell phone —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.29.157.48 (talk) 04:07, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: this is spam about an unreleased phone. Cliff smith  talk  15:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete-It is just an advertisement. Ṝέđ ṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a lineReview Me! 16:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as current WP:Articles for deletion/Nokia N79. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom.  Lady   Galaxy  22:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or ReWrite. Okay - there are many Wikipedia-articles about mobile-phones (see Nokia E90 Communicator for example). Still this N85-article sems more like an advertisement and/or spam about an unreleased phone. Maybe no need to delete if the phone would be released, and if the article would have more information. Ilyushka88 (talk) 09:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.