Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia Normandy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:43, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Nokia Normandy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreleased product, not officially confirmed, "Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors." ViperSnake151   Talk  15:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: The phone is universally recognised by the media to be under development, and the images of the working device on the internet are anecdotal proof of this. The article has existed here for over a month and is a topic of growing interest in the media, with over 8,770,000 results on Google.
 * Following the advice on that page, I'll merge the article with the Normandy section on the Nokia article once the AfD is closed if needed. --RaviC (talk) 17:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: Based on the same reasoning as described by . Additionally, the above mentioned WP:CRYSTALBALL guideline states this: It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced.  Obviously, this article contains more than enough good references.
 * Also, it seems that the final fate of this device is going to become known in February this year, and at that time this article either becomes a "true" one, or it becomes merged into section.  Hope you agree. &mdash; Dsimic (talk) 22:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Just for everyone's information, the article gained a whopping 6169 views yesterday alone, which was greater than the views for the iPhone 5S, Galaxy S4, Nexus 5, Moto X, HTC One, Lumia 1020, LG G2 and Lumia 520 - making it [one of] the most viewed smartphone articles. There's no greater metric of interest and relevance than that! --RaviC (talk) 15:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep As per above, and per the fact that it seems to be a very heavily discussed topic in reliable online publications Cogito-Ergo-Sum (14) (talk) 20:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.