Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nola Adé


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:48, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Nola Adé

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. All of the references in the article are not reliable. Although the article contains a total of 7 references, there are in fact only three sources. The Rolling Out source is an interview and isn't independent of the subject. The Nolaade.com source is the artist's website, a primary source. The Singersroom source doesn't appear to be notable, as it is a platform designed to promote artists.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 02:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 03:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 03:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 03:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 03:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON. Aside from the sources in the article, I found https://www.allmusic.com/artist/nola-ade-mn0003510470/credits which has no bio and https://www.allmusic.com/album/love-dance-mw0002941362 which has no review. There are passing mentions of her in Chicago news sources, but nothing that is in-depth. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:19, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm afraid notability has not been demostrated. With no reliable source, subject definately fails ALL notability criteria. A google search also returns nothing impressive. Maybe in a couple of years. Mahveotm (talk) 23:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment She was featured in Jet. But I think she may be TOOSOON, also. Just wanted to point out there IS an RS out there for her... there just needs to be more. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 04:10, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Fails GNG / MUSICBIO. Not even borderline. Britishfinance (talk) 00:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.