Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nolan Batman Series Villains


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Nolan Batman Series Villains

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is nothing but a list formed entirely of in universe style PLOT vio, of material far more properly covered with citations and depth in the two proper film articles, Batman Begins and The Dark Knight (film). Those two articles far better address the importance of characters, the ideas behind them held by the writers, directors, and/or actors. The material also represents more of a FORK than anything else. The editors seem to know how to wikilink, but have opted not to. It reads almost like a fansite.

There is no need for a redirect as the title is an improbable search string, and there is no one 'obvious' location, as the list tries to cover both films. ThuranX (talk) 20:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 23:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep and add references. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 15:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * WHY?. Please give some ACTUAL reasons WHY it should be kept. It is thoroughly redundant, completely unsourced, and written in a highly POV way. It is not linked to almost any of the relevant other articles, functioning as a Walled Garden. Each of the characters is better covered in the movie article, or in their own articles, where citation and wikilinking is provided, and where more people are likely to look than searching for the unlikely title which this article has. ThuranX (talk) 21:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since no reliable sources exist that could serve to help us avoid original research, allow for verification as to the relevance and accuracy of its claims, and establish t hat these fictional persons have some sort of independent notability beyond the fictional works that they appear in and are already well covered here.Bali ultimate (talk) 23:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nominator is exactly right. Eusebeus (talk) 15:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as wholly unreferenced and consisting entirely of plot. —   pd_THOR  undefined | 23:22, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.