Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nomi Tang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomi Tang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In world advertising article. No context outwith the company, the sex toys intrude. Ref's are all to sites about trade papers and reviews. Clearly asserts WP:NOT scope_creep (talk) 00:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete not enough sources to demonstrate notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 20:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 16:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I just read the first line Nomi Tang, an Asian-German entrepreneur, has set out to develop a range of stylish high-quality sex toys, such as silicone vibrators, love balls and prostate massager to meet the demand of design-savvy and pleasure seeking consumers. That's enough. Literally no good sources are available. The article was created by who seems to have a COI. As this is a WP:PROMO case, I will go with a delete. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.