Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nominate janice brown rogers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete --Cel e stianpower hablamé 17:41, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Nominate janice brown rogers
Polemics &asymp; jossi fresco &asymp; 02:22, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as POV essay. The title is garbled also; the judge is Janice Rogers Brown. --Metropolitan90 02:30, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - POV rant, probably just posted to stir up anti-Miers sentiment - not coherent enough to be a serious argument. BD2412  talk 04:14, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a blog entry expressing a personal opinion. It is not an encyclopedia entry written according to NPOV. It is doubtful that anybody would search for information on this title and there is nothing that can be usefully added to our article on Judge Brown. Capitalistroadster 04:26, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as inherently POV by title. Nothing useful can be made out of this. --Jacquelyn Marie 13:28, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as un-encyclopædic POV.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 13:46, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete nn, POV, essay, vanity. Jesse 14:51, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV. Original research? CLW 15:23, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.