Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NomoGaia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

NomoGaia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable per WP:ORG - sources provided do not demonstrate notability. Better sources do not appear to exist. ukexpat (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Maybe try again with it later, after the UN takes its vote and NomoGaia comes into a position of greater prominence.  See Talk:NomoGaia.  JohnInDC (talk) 15:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — ukexpat (talk) 15:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not (yet) notable organisation being promoted by someone with a declared COI. &mdash; RHaworth 17:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the above. Also a likely copyright violation. The original first sentences are lifted from here and the author also wrote the now deleted Human Rights Impact Assessment, which contained passages from at least two sources. I find it improbable that only these sentences were lifted and the rest is de novo. --Danger (talk) 23:46, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.