Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-Nuclear Futures: The Case for an Ethical Energy Strategy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Non-admin closure. D ARTH P ANDA duel 20:07, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Non-Nuclear Futures: The Case for an Ethical Energy Strategy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable book. No indication of notable outside reviews, no indication of fame or prominence for the book. The book is not encyclopedic. ScienceApologist (talk) 10:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article has a review which appeared in Energy Policy (a scholarly journal) in 1976. This establishes notability. -- Eastmain (talk) 23:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Agree with Eastmain. Amory Lovins is a well-known author, see List of books by Amory Lovins. Johnfos (talk) 23:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:BK. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as it appears to be quite notable.  D ENNIS B ROWN  (T) (C) 15:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.