Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-event


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Soft redirect to Wiktionary. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  03:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Non-event

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Simple definition. At best, this belongs in wictionary. Toddst1 (talk) 18:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * delete as per: WP:NOTDIC.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Soft redirect to Wiktionary. Nothing to show notability or interest beyond a dictionary term and it's already at Wiktionary (wikt:non-event). clpo13(talk) 19:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Logic-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 19:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 19:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 19:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)


 * If the article doesn't get expanded or turned into a disambiguation page, then it's best to soft redirect to wiktionary: the page has on average received 95 views per day for the last three months and these are mostly due to people searching for the term, as barely anything links there. Uanfala (talk) 19:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Soft redirect to Wiktionary per WP:NOTDIC and the criteria at Template:Wiktionary redirect. Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Non-article. Wikt redirect is fine. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Soft redirect per . Surprisingly, it gets hundreds of hits a day. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 01:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. Even more interesting - it received 4000 page views on June 24 2016 . I am wondering what large "non-event" took place on that day, where people had to look this up? That is amazing. It has leveled off to between 40 and 50 page views by July 7. Overall, it appears the average is actually around 40 page views per day.


 * Well, I hope this fulfilled everyone's trivia quota for the day. In any case,, this is not a topic it is only a word - so my Ivote is for whatever consensus decides.Steve Quinn (talk) 05:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 24 June is when the surprising results came out of the UK's referendum on EU membership and the likely result of that, Brexit, has even more surprisingly been described as a non-event. Uanfala (talk) 08:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Soft redirect to Wiktionary per Patar Knight. Per WP:NOTDIC, does not qualify for a standalone article.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 16:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.