Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-standard poker hand


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 02:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Non-standard poker hand

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Very poorly referenced topic, possibly WP:OR since no source cited (there are just two footnotes) suggests this is a common name, and GS search for this topic yields zero results. Some content might merit merger to the Glossary of poker terms and/or List of poker hands, but again, just two footnotes... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:50, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  07:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Many of these have a long documented history. Many seemingly going back to before at least 1956, here's another reference from University of Chicago Press. This seems to be another ref . Discussed as a group so they also meet NLIST. &mdash;siro&chi;o 10:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets WP:NLIST. Sources provided make this a notable topic worthy of a standalone article User:Let'srun 18:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Discussed as long ago as 1901 and treated as a group, these are well-suited to list treatment. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.