Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nong Pee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Nong Pee

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Definitely doesn't satisfy association football notability. The sources don't really qualify for general notability as this is a case of WP:BLP1E. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing convincing in both standards and policies. SwisterTwister   talk  04:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Right now the subject fails WP:1E, and it's too soon to know if he'd become notable in the future. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  20:28, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 20:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - only known for one event Spiderone  20:38, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG CBS 527 Talk 04:06, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - clear WP:BLP1E. Fenix down (talk) 07:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly too soon for any sort of article. WP:BLP1E, WP:NFOOTY, and WP:GNG all failed. — Jkudlick &#x2693; t &#x2693; c &#x2693; s 00:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.