Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nononono (manga)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfy to User:KrebMarkt/Nononono (manga).   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 01:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Nononono (manga)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Lacking notability and sources DragonZero (talk · contribs) 06:09, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment Since I'm the one who deprodded it, I'll repeat here that this is a series by a notable author that has lasted long enough to suggest it's a successful hit series. Neither of these things establishes notability, but I figured it was worth a look at least. At this point it looks like the page was probably created prematurely. Doceirias (talk) 07:27, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --KrebMarkt 08:02, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga for the discussion leading up to this AFD. -- as 67.58.229.153 (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment My position is roughly that of Doceirias (whom I keep tyoping as Dorcerias, dang it) -- that it has survived serialization as long as it has strongly suggests it's a hit series, but I've found precious little in English to substantiate this, meaning I've got nothing that proves it to the letter of wikilaw. Am not !voting one way or another, pending whether sources supporting notability in other languages (particularly Japanese) can be found. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Lacking significant coverage in reliable sources, it isn't notable. How long it runs might be an "indicator" of success, but without the sources it is not the place of Wikipedia editors to decide it is notable anyway. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 14:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per talk at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. I even put up a 7 day tag of construction to see if anything could be found to improve the article, the 7 days came and went and here we are now. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep The Japanese page for this series mentions that it was featured in an episode of the TV program "Manga no Genba" which reviews manga. This can be confirmed by their episode listing which shows the episode as having been aired on December 23, 2008. I was able to find a little less than 20 minutes of video from that episode on youtube, and the coverage is not trivial and could help create a "production" section for the article. There is also a review of sorts on Livedoor news of a Nononono Glove which Young Jump gave away as a prize recently to celebrate the Winter Olympics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SMimas (talk • contribs) 06:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Userfy on me. After pondering it, i think it would be better to have it on my userspace. The minimum requirement is the equivalent of 2 non-trivial reviews from sources of good standing (RS) for a keep vote from my part. The NHK TV show review counts for 1. --KrebMarkt 15:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Userfy per Krebmarkt. No harm in keeping hold of the content outside articlespace for future use if sources arrive.Dandy Sephy (talk) 16:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * A previous episodes of the show covered Urusei Yatsura :p --KrebMarkt 20:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Based on SMimas's find, and the fact that it has been ongoing for years in one of the most popular manga magazines there is.  D r e a m Focus  09:17, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know, no one might work on it to establish reliability and it might just be afd again. That seems to be the biggest problem. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 03:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.