Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noodles! (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily deleted (A7) by Nyttend. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 14:24, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Noodles! (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Non-notable per WP:BAND, unreferenced, no trace of the band can be found online, no mention of the band on Lookout! Records website, no evidence for assertions of gold and platinum status or thousands of record sales, evident WP:Conflict of interest by creator, probable WP:HOAX. Prod contested by anonymous editor with an IP address in Meerut. Top Jim (talk) 08:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Top Jim (talk) 08:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —Top Jim (talk) 08:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete article has no sources, I'm tempted to rescue the article but as you say top Jim, you couldn't find anything online so i doubt this band is notable enough--Lerdthenerd (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, violates WP:V. Claims are completely unsourceable. The content of the article leads me to believe that they would not pass WP:BAND regardless. -- Kinu t /c  10:21, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete The information about platinum and gold albums may be sufficient to avoid CSD A7, but it puts it in the realm of hoaxes... G3. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 10:56, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment article's creator (named in the article as a band member) has now been blocked indefintely for removing AFD tags and maintenance templates. Top Jim (talk) 10:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * But someone has put the wrong block notice on their talk page, saying they've been tempory blocked as a sockpuppet, you might want to correct that so it matches the reason they've been blocked on their contribution page--Lerdthenerd (talk) 11:15, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * An admin has now fixed this, thanks. Top Jim (talk) 11:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: as non-notable, failing WP:BAND. Gold status in India requires selling only 7,500 copies internationally so it may be true, but who cares?  We're talking about an EP here that sold 7,500 copies. Toddst1 (talk) 11:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Sure looks like a G3 to me. Doesn't show up on any searches. Even a search on Lookout! Records' website (which the article says released their "early releases") draws a blank. Victorian Mutant (Talk) 12:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable band, no sourcing at all. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G3 or A7. Obviously ridiculous statements aren't enough to dodge an A7.  Frankly, the reasoning doesn't matter as long as it goes. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonnote The Eskimo (talk) 16:24, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.