Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nora Roelofse Naude


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:40, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Nora Roelofse Naude

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. All relationships and staff should be in an infobox... but then the article, apart from the infobox, contains 1 line long information. No notability, no nothing. We really have to start cleaning up fictional characters of soap operas. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No real content, no notabillity.  abf  /talk to me/  17:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  treelo  radda  18:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   --  treelo  radda  18:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete in its current state. The solution is to create one familytree and add it to the characters page, not create an article for each character listing their relationships. – sgeureka t•c 18:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete All evidence to the contrary, wikipedia is not a directory of characters for fictional subjects. Protonk (talk) 23:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, or merge to Egoli: Place of Gold. No notability outside that series.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep and recommend TTN and Magioladitus actually find and sources for a change.--63.3.1.2 (talk) 14:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * At least google search doesn't give NOTHING (only copies of the Wikipedia article). Moreover, there is no article in Wikipedia about the actress! -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. WP:PLOT applies here, as the article does not indicate any notable discussion of the reception, impact, and significance of this particular fictional character. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:36, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as usual for characters of this sort. Not enough information yet to support an article. (I think the character page has yet to be made). I note that none of the objections above apply to including information about the characters in a combination page, as they do not have to be separately notable. DGG (talk) 18:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge. RS do exist. , .  Not overwhelming, but I only spent a few minutes looking.Hobit (talk) 23:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per TTN's nom. Eusebeus (talk) 23:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, lacking substantial content. Mr. Absurd (talk) 01:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.