Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norby Roque Salonga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SpinningSpark 16:03, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Norby Roque Salonga

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established, only states the subject's awards for his works as a youth leader. Has a tone of a personal profile page of the subject. Has COI issues.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 02:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 02:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Someone has WP:BOMBARDed this page to prevent it getting deleted, and many of the links are from social media sites, including LinkedIn, Facebook, and Youtube. My own searches turned up almost no mentions. Even if there is some trivial coverage, it looks to be entirely local and doesn't make the subject notable. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * QueenOfTheGil posted this on the page's talk page:

May I respectfully ask for a reconsideration to deleting this page in view of the following reasons:


 * The person being cited on this page has significantly contributed to his sector of specializations, hence, his story may be considered as a public information
 * The person's information that are written on this page are all available on the net, hence, I, as a contributor just decided to put everything together in one article.
 * All references and citations are legitimate websites and credible pages, so I don't think, there's an intent to plagiarize or create information just for the purpose of creating a page
 * Kindly consider reviewing his story on the net and see how inspiring this person is not just to me but to the people he worked with or the audience he shared his thoughts with through workshops and seminars.
 * I'd also like ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I GOT TOO EXCITED SEEING MY CONTRIBUTION on the net through Wikipedia but i was not aware of some technicalities in using such, hence, i would appreciate your guidance on this.

With all these, i look forward to your kind consideration.

Posting this on behalf of the user.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 04:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:13, 26 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: The WP:SPA article creator removed the AfD notice, which I've now reinstated. AllyD (talk) 07:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Highbeam has good coverage of Philippines media: it shows coverage in the Filipino Express, Filipino Reporter, Manila Times & Manila Bulletin of other people named Roque and Salonga, but nothing on this person. AllyD (talk) 08:02, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 10:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC) Comment: the afd was once again removed. reinstated by a bot.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 16:29, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: I meant to return to this after my comment above. Despite the mass of references added to the article, they are a broth of social media, blogs and brief mentions of group student awards. Between that and the silence of the Highbeam-indexed Philippines media on this person, I do not think the notability criteria are met. AllyD (talk) 19:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - in spite of the WP:BOMBARD, searches do not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show that WP:GNG is met.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:03, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.