Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordic Assistance to Vietnam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn due to sources found. LibStar (talk) 01:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Nordic Assistance to Vietnam

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:ORG. 2 hits in gnews. unless someone can find something in Norwegian. LibStar (talk) 01:41, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The more I look, the more I find. The parent agency name was slightly wrong and the organization's focus was stated too narrowly, both of which may have hampered searching. Also an English-language page on the parent's website that was cited twice has either disappeared or been moved, but I found it elsewhere and found others on that site in addition to external coverage. I noticed how closely these religious charities are cooperating, rather than competing, and I wonder if that might have reduced the impression of notability - for example I found a detailed article on what's to be done about Typhoon Ketsana relief in Vietnam and then at the end it simply states that NAV is the designated agency to do it. That's not flashy but a solid hit. I've improved the article as best I can without diving into Norwegian newspapers; I believe there is sufficient evidence of notability in the article now. Yngvadottir (talk) 00:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.