Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norma Starkey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Characters of Shameless. Merge as needed. Pastordavid (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Norma Starkey

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N and WP:FICT. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 23:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —Quasirandom (talk) 23:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Paularblaster (talk) 00:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * comment merge to list of characters is most logical, please rename if kept to Norma Starkey (Shameless) Gnangarra 13:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC) see below
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Make a list of minor characters, and merge along with some of the other characters. No point in deleting this.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 00:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into Shameless TV article by creating a list of characters. Editors there can fight out which parts of this character summary are appropriate, but I don't believe this character warrants her own Wiki article. Tanthalas39 (talk) 03:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete the article Characters of Shameless already exists as such theres n need to merge Gnangarra 03:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes. Changing my opinion to delete. Of course, this needs to be applied to the other dozen or so characters, each with their own Wiki page... Tanthalas39 (talk) 04:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge or Keep for now. I think a re-write of Characters of Shameless is needed.  Majors go one place (each  have own page as needed) and minors go into a single page.  Lots of work for someone. Hobit (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as this stub has insufficient content, context or reliable secondary sources to demonstrate the necessity of having a stand alone article.--Gavin Collins (talk) 22:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge. Gavin Collins's reasons are good, but the conclusion I draw is the same as Hobit -- the characters article can hold whatever information is needed about the characters. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 23:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Gavin Collins. Doctorfluffy (talk) 17:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge I think all the articles about characters in Shameless should be merged because they all seem a bit short. yettie0711 (talk) 19:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.