Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North American Brazilian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, consensus is that is not a notable topic. Davewild (talk) 16:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

North American Brazilian

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Basically exact same reason as Articles for deletion/Danish Brazilian, Articles for deletion/Georgian Brazilian and Articles for deletion/Luxembourgian Brazilian - absolutely no content other than the fact that a fringe, made-up ethnic group exists. Not to mention the article is a misnomer as it would have to include Canadian Brazilian and Mexican Brazilian, 2 articles made by the same author which are also either up for deletion or have already been deleted. JuJube (talk) 04:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- Oh no, not more of this! Reyk  YO!  04:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination history of similar categories Rasadam (talk) 09:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete this repetitive creation of junk non-notable no-information no-value articles must stop. No, really... it must stop.--Paul McDonald (talk) 11:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, unworthy. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 14:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that this qualifies (or comes darned close to qualifying) as patent nonsense per CSD G1, because it opens the door to absurd inclusionism. You can come up with countless categories (e.g., Djiboutian Asthmatics or Lichtensteinian Thumb-twiddlers) that alert us to the existence of real people, but for no intelligible reason whatsoever. Cosmic Latte (talk) 15:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.